|
|||||||
The
Relevance of Connectivity and Spatiality to Identity Formation and Citizenship
Relationships at
School and Elsewhere : Canadian Youth's Constructions of Self and Others Yvonne
Hébert and Christine Racicot University
of Calgary WORKING DRAFT Presentation
within the Symposium
on Citizenship Education and Identity at
the Fourth International Metropolis Conference December
7-12, 1999 in Washington, D.C. Introduction In
modernity, the construction of identities became an individual task and
responsibility, as in a lifelong project, 'un projet de vie'[1],
which required a reliability of contexts in which the whole was greater than
the self. Today, however, youth live in
an uncertain postmodern world characterized by several social trends, such as
major environmental pressures, globalization, multiples centres of power,
changing North American relations, population ageing, social differentiation,
technological change and value change.[2]
Taken all together, these major pressures and changes reveal an absence of
visible structure and logic especially in terms of the unrelenting pressure of
global harmonization, by universal deregulation dominated by irrational and immoral market competition,
by the weakening of safety nets once afforded by families, neighbourhoods and
communities, and by an essential interdeterminacy of the world.[3] In meeting what are considerable challenges,
immigrant youth are required to live with others as strangers on a daily basis
and to reconstruct themselves in an on-going process in new contexts. Yet
questions arise about how young people actualize themselves, especially when
the distinctions between self and others need to be constantly constructed and
reconstructed in this uncertain context.
In Canada, a country constructed over time by waves of immigrants
wherein each one was constructed as strangers by the previously established
inhabitants,[4] the
required reliability of stable and certain contexts may never have existed even
during modernity. Nonetheless, over time, difference and pluralism have come to
be considered as an inherently valuable
social good, worthy of protection in
state policy and law.[5] Allowing for the transversal nature of
current social changes, a plurality of ways of belonging, and a multiplicity of
groupings, this context, created by a modern state but actualized within an
increasingly postmodern one, may not be sufficiently stable and embedding for
the uncertainty is permanent and irreducible.[6] In this complex context, we wonder how youth
are creating themselves, as persons and as citizens, amidst a plurality of
identities and cultural groupings in the Canadian multicultural society.[7]
More specifically, we wonder how immigrant youth are constructing themselves and
how they are learning to engage in civil and social participation in Canadian
society. And finally, we wonder how the construction of youthful selves and of others, in uncertain postmodern
contexts, could inform educational policy and practices. What is Identity? The concept of identity refers to an individual's sense of uniqueness,
of knowing who one is and who one is not, developed in dynamic interaction
between self and others. The development of a stable sense of identity is one
of the central processes of adolescence, moving from childhood into adulthood.
Immigration calls upon individuals to re-construct themselves in a new society
and identity formation is key to integration. As newcomers, facing unfamiliar
languages, spaces, and interaction patterns, children and adolescents must go
to unfamiliar schools and try to make a place for themselves. Well-accepted definitions of identity includes several components of
interest to us: the view of identity as a dynamic continuous process that is
aimed at individual uniqueness, the location of this development within a group
having a shared sense of community or peoplehood; and the realization that this
involves multiple identifications as well as multiple social, psychological and
cultural dimensions.[8] This definition also allows for the
development of a national identity, representing relationships among citizens
as well as between citizens and the state, an important dimension of identity
which includes elements of civic and societal culture, heritage, allegiance and
patriotism.[9] The understanding of cultural contexts of identity formation has also
been modified over time, moving away from being perceived as a complex whole,
manifested in fixed social structures, in stereotypical patterns of thought, action
and beliefs, in the way of life of a people, in the processes of adaptation to
the environment, in the inculcation of the youth, with no need for an active
subject at all.[10]
Instead, culture has come to be viewed as being the ability to take meaningful
intersubjective action, involving an active, context-orientated appropriation
of knowledge and significations within a framework of guided participation.[11] Set in today's world which may be viewed as
a single horizontal and vertical field of socio-economic interaction, with
uneven distribution of power,[12]
conceptions of culture make room for change as implicit and fluid, to yield a
concept of flowing cultural complexity, much like a river, forever changing
within perimeters of space and time.[13] Within this modified new understanding of
culture, identity is constructed and reconstructed through social and political
practices, and the integration process involves weaving elements from social
fields of origin and of the host country, to create a new self constantly and
unendingly undergoing further modification. In light of social and cultural transformations, the hope of
postmodernity lies in the possibilities for moving beyond disputes of all
kinds, having deconstructed these for greater understanding. Thus could be
revealed conditions of individual freedom which transcend the deeply rooted
centrism and other limitations of nation-states, of ethnicities, of tribes; as
well as the sole essence of human universality with its foci on individual
choice, and on ultimate personal responsibility for that choice, and on states'
recognition of the right to choose.[14] Research Project
and Methodology Our on-going research project intends (a) to examine adolescents'
process of identity formation, with
particular attention to strategic, spatial, associative, discursive and
developmental practices, in a variety of school and life situations, (b) to
analyze their strategic competence within this process, and (c) to understand
the links between strategic competence as an integral part of identity
formation and theories of culture and alterity.[15]
Set in a western Canadian city, Calgary which receives more school-age
immigrant youth per capita than any other Canadian city,[16]
our project focused in year one on the spatial and associative practices
revealed in adolescents' maps or representations of spaces occupied at school
and elsewhere, in sociograms (networks of friends and associates), in
geneograms (family trees), as well as in open-ended and exploratory interviews
in walkabouts. For the purposes of this paper, we focus upon the data in the
form of drawings of spaces which
research participants occupy at school and elsewhere, referring to other forms
of data as needed to provide additional insight into emerging patterns. Situated within qualitative and interpretative paradigms, the data was
collected by two research assistants, in five sessions, four of which were in
focus groups, with a total of sixty-seven student participants during
Winter-Spring 1999.[17] The first session brought participants
together to develop a profile for each one and to invite discussion of their
journey to Canada, their views on Canadian citizenship and life, as well as
issues related to group and family membership. A second session focused on the
construction of the geneograms (family trees) followed by a discussion of
family histories and relations. A third session followed a similar pattern,
focusing on the preparation of sociograms (maps of their friendships) and a
discussion of friendship. Inviting participants to draw a map of the spaces
which they occupy at school and elsewhere,[18]
through the use of pastels on large sheets of paper, the fourth session
concluded with a verbal description of these spaces and commentary on their
importance and significance. A fifth and final session featured a
video-recorded walkabout these spaces, led by and sometimes recorded by the
student participants themselves, singly or in pairs. As part of the research process, analysis and interpretations of these
rich, nuanced, graphic and discursive data began during the data collecting
period and continued during Fall 1999, with a statistical analysis by means of
SPSS as well as visual and content analyses. This paper offers our preliminary,
exploratory understandings, as informed researchers, of the spatial elements,
informed by the participants' recorded descriptions and discussion of their
maps. Profile of the
Participants Sixty-two student participants from eight Calgary junior and senior
high schools completed maps of their spaces. Of these, the gender distribution
is nearly identical, with thirty males and thirty-two females. Approximately
eighty-five percent of these participants were in the ninth grade at the time
of the study; the other fifteen percent were tenth graders. Eighty-seven
percent of the students are either fourteen or fifteen years old whereas the
remaining thirteen percent are either sixteen or seventeen years old. The diversity of Calgary's immigrant population in Calgary is reflected
in the demographic indicators, in terms of countries of origin, language
fluency, categorical status in Canada, and religious affiliation. Participants
originate from twenty-eight countries, with almost half coming from East Asia
(e.g. People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Korea). South Asian and Middle
Eastern countries contribute about fifteen percent each to our student
participants. Every one indicates that he or she speaks at least two languages,
with nearly sixty percent identifying facility with three or more languages.
Nearly eighty percent say their strongest language is something other than
English or French, the two official languages of Canada. More than half of them
(fifty-five percent) have been in Canada for four years or less. Roughly
thirteen percent of the participants have spent more than half their lives
(i.e. seven or more years) in Canada. Three of the sixty-two students possess
either refugee or visitor status. By far (i.e. sixty percent), most students'
legal status is 'landed immigrant,' with the remaining (i.e. thirty-four
percent) holding Canadian citizenship. Ninety-two percent of students are
religiously affiliated to various groups, with Catholics, Christians, and
Muslims each comprising twenty percent or more of the sample (24%, 20%, and 28%,
respectively) whereas nearly ten percent claim no religious affiliation. Three Essential
Concepts for Analysis To analyze these data and to arrive at the very core of the
construction of self in relationship with others, we reach beyond the usual categories
such as ethnicity, language and religion, in recognition of the socially
constructed nature of these categories within modernity and of their limited
explanatory value for and insightfulness into underlying processes of lived
experience. Instead, we call upon more fluid organizing concepts such as
connectivity, boundedness and spatiality, all having extent and duration, as
plausibly central to dynamic processes of identity formation which include the
development of a sense of belonging, in this case, of becoming Canadian. The first concept, connectivity, refers to the quality of being
connected to oneself and to others, in a general and specific sense. Of
particular interest to the analytic concept of connectivity are the
sub-concepts of immediacy and ubiquity, where the former occurs in time
and refers to the conscious quality and content of being immediate, of being
free from intervention, and of direct presence. The latter notion, ubiquity,
occurs in space and refers to the quality of being present in more than one
place at the same time. The second analytic concept, boundedness, refers to the physical
and symbolic quality of being bounded, of being confined or restricted, of
having limits, and of enclosure. Boundaries as forms of inclusivity serve
as protection from the outside, define who is included and who is not, and may
offer a symbiotic sense of organic, psychologically inner and even monastic
cell, which is an integral part of the individual while being dissimilar. The
boundaries themselves may be airtight and watertight, that is, characterized by
their permeability. Defined as the quality of pertaining to space, spatiality as a third analytic
concept refers to the private-public nature and use of spaces, to the
staking out of places and territories as one's own, and to the visibility
and ambiguity of self and others in those spaces. By their iconic
nature, these three concepts are analytically promising for they pertain to
qualities which are intrinsic to the processes of identity formation, as to
construct and reconstruct themselves, youth require to negotiate connections to
a variety of others, be they friends, acquaintances or family members; need to
have boundaries set for them and to set limits for themselves and others; and
enact their construction in living spaces. Making
Connections: The Salience of Immediacy The most striking feature of the group of drawings of participants'
spaces is the way the recently emigrated represent their experiences in Canada,
compared with participants who have resided in the country for nearly half
their lives or longer. According to analyses set in modernity, it is
well-established that, for many, the immigration process is wrought with major
cultural adjustments and upheavals. Social ties from the originating country
may be often severed or truncated while new languages and patterns of social
interaction must be learned to assimilate successfully with mainstream groups.
Regression analyses of this data indicate that the single best predictor for determining
whether students represent friends in their drawings is length of time in
Canada. Contrary to expectation, there is an inverse relation between the
length of time lived in Canada and the representation of friends in drawings,
as representative of connectivity in the form of social ties. For participants
who have lived in Canada for six or more years, just over thirty percent
definitively represent their friends. By comparison, however, seventy-five
percent of those who have lived in Canada less than six years draw friends in
their drawings. To establish the representation of friends in drawings, as
opposed to random, generic people or family members, we turned to sociograms
and interview discussions so as to definitively identify the representation of
friends in the various elements of their maps or drawings. This pattern
suggests that having friends is a matter of considerable immediacy to the newly
arrived. Source of Friends. This
raises a question however about whether the friends represented in the drawings
of participants who have lived in
Canada for a short period are overwhelmingly friends from their original
countries. Given the challenges of adapting to a new culture, this indeed would
be expected since it would suggest that recent emigrants find solace in
maintaining social networks from their countries of origin. However, our drawings suggest different
patterns. Not only are the recently arrived more likely to represent friends in
their drawings, they are also more likely than other participants who have
lived longer in Canada (i.e. greater than five years) to represent specifically
friends in explicitly Canadian contexts. Forty-one percent of the
participants who have lived in the country less than five years represent
Canadian friends in their pictures compared with less than twenty-nine percent
of those who have lived more than five years in Canada. Nonetheless,
approximately one quarter of those who have resided in this country for less
than five years choose to represent friends from their countries of origin, and
none from Canada. Less than fifteen
percent of this group do not represent friends at all while less than ten
percent of the participants situate friends in both Canada and their origin
countries. With the remaining group of drawings, it was not possible to
distinguish friends from non-friends. The patterns are strongly distinguished
from the drawing patterns associated with participants who have resided in
Canada between five and twelve years. Sixty-two percent of this group do not
represent any friends in their pictures, and none represent friends in both
Canadian and non-Canadian contexts. Friendship as Critical Strategy for Survival. These findings suggest several possibilities
about the role social connections play in helping participants become
integrated as actual or future Canadian citizens. We suggest that recently
arrived participants must adopt critical strategies for social survival in
their new countries which psychologically orient them towards feeling connected
to their new environments. Recently
emigrated participants might be more likely than others explicitly to situate
friends in Canadian contexts because the role of friends and social networks in
their lives are manifestly more important. These immediate connections can be
less taken for granted as newly arrived youth attempt to forge social ties
among often already well-established social networks. One strategy that facilitates attunement to a new social environment is
a demonstration of one's solidarity with peers. This is important for showing
others that one is amiable and open to new friendships while also reassuring
oneself, perhaps at a non-deliberate level, that one can succeed and 'feel at
home' in the new environment. Students who have spent most of their lives here,
even though they may have stronger and wider networks of friends, are more
confident in their sense of social incorporation and feel less of a collective
need to demonstrate proof of the immediacy of their connectivity. Moreover, having
friends in more than one place, which refers to the ubiquitous nature of
friendship, among the recently arrived and those who have been here more than
five years is considerably less significant. Multiple Ways of Belonging. Feeling connected to one's social setting does not necessarily entail
greater commitment to making friends beyond one's group of origin and making
links with Canadian youth. Of the participants who have lived in Canada for
less then three years, seventy-five percent list as their closest friends
members of the same ethnic group. While it is possible that this means that
these youth are forming 'minority enclave' mentalities that are de facto
segregated from members of different ethnic or cultural backgrounds, it is more
likely that these youth are simply protecting and securing themselves from
overwhelming assimilation into the Canadian mainstream by selecting friends who
resemble them in some way, one of the common and usual criteria for the choice
of friends.[19] This
interpretation is also consistent with allowing for differentiated identities
which evoke a plurality of ways of being Canadian, recognized in policy and in
law, as well as in multiple discourses.[20] Although one might be tempted to claim that recently immigrated youth who
represent friends in Canadian contexts are more socially incorporated than
those who draw friends in non-Canadian contexts or who do not represent friends
at all, our data does not support an analysis of degree of integration. What
the data does show is that, as an organizing constructive concept, connectivity
intersects with inclusive boundedness, so as to have friends in the new setting
but to preferentially select them from within one's own group, thus making
oneself available for acceptance while preserving a sense of belonging to one's
origins. Connectivity and Weaving of Cultural Elements. What does strongly appear to be the case is
that after five years upon arrival to Canada, the salience of social
connections which participants maintain to their origin countries wane,
regardless of gender, religion or indicators of introversion in the drawings.
Their ethnic pride may still be substantial, but the emotional connections to
specific people in those countries lessens. None of the participants who emigrated
to Canada more than five years before situate friends in other countries. That
this group of participants is also less likely to represent friends of any sort
in their pictures than the more recently arrived participants, can be
interpreted against the context of the other findings in several ways. The most
implausible, it seems to us, is that the cohort of participants who emigrated
to Canada between five and twelve years ago are by nature less sociable than
the more recently arrived youth. A second, more compelling interpretation
underscores the symbolic nature in which recently arrived participants use the
representation of their friends in drawings as co-optative strategies for
negotiating acceptance, or possibly a willingness for acceptance, among
peers. A third possible interpretation is that the absence of representation of
any friends in drawings may reflect a sense of alienation, evolving over
several years of trying to reconcile becoming incorporated into the social
fabric while attempting to perform justice to one's sense of ethnic heritage.
Supported by informal conversations with ESL and heritage language teachers, a
fourth and more plausible interpretation is that these youngsters feel
reasonably secure in their acceptance and can afford to take their friends for
granted as their attention is taken by other more salient factors, suggestive
of joint overlapping phenomena, of the recurring construction of friendship and
of a variable weaving of cultural elements into their self-identification
process. Self and Family. The
striking feature about the representation of self in the drawings is that as
students grow older, they are less apt to put themselves in their own drawings.
Eighty-four percent of the fourteen-year olds represent themselves in their own
drawing, compared with 73 % of the fifteen-year olds and approximately 63% of
the sixteen and seventeen year olds. This is however understandable in terms of
developmental stages, for it is in the early adolescent years that egocentrism
is at its height, as youngsters cope with the passage from childhood to
adulthood, when individuals are expected to be able to delay gratification and
to care others and important tasks rather than continuing to focus upon
themselves. This supports the fourth interpretation offered above, for student
participants who have been in Canada for 5-12 years which suggests that with
time, participants tend to feel secure in themselves, to take friends for
granted and to turn to the acquisition and mastery of other cultural elements
as part of a life-long process of (re)construction of self. Spatiality: The
Salience of Public Spaces Mapping the spaces which the student participants occupy requires an
analysis of the nature and enactment of these places, for identity formation as
persons and also as citizens. Of particular interest is the applicability of
analytic concepts such as territoriality of public and private spaces, of real
and imagined places, as well as the permeability of boundaries and the fluidity
of movement . Consumerism, Convenience and Churches. The most common feature across the drawings
is the representation of what may be termed public spaces: movie cinemas,
TV/music, stores or malls, restaurants, convenience stores, places of worship
and homes, as well as computers as windows into virtual space and time, and
video games/arcades, cutting across variables of school, age, grade, religion,
ethnicity, time in country, legal status, gender, and most fluent language. The
best predictive factor of the presence of movie cinemas in the drawings is
legal status. Nearly 30% of the Canadian citizens represent cinemas, compared
to only 8% of the landed immigrants, and 0% of the refugees or visitors. Of the
students who claim either Chinese, Vietnamese, Korean, or Urdu as their
strongest language, one-third of them represent churches, compared with 15% of
those who claim English as their most fluent language. And most strikingly,
every student but one put a convenience store in her or her drawing. Representing this generally as an immediate and salient response to the
pervasiveness of consumerism in North American societies, the presence of the
convenience story is telling. Such an establishment represents an ease of
access and availability, to a public space which student citizens may occupy
with little question, resistance or contestation; however, it may also provide
a real and imaginary link to the marketplace, one in which family fortunes
would determine direct participation, for a student may loiter briefly in a
convenience store without actually making any purchases, even minor ones. Thus,
the store, an aptly named convenience, may well represent a wished-for link to
the riches and fortunes of mythical proportion in the new land. The distribution of cinemas according to categorical status in Canada
lends support to such a symbolic analysis of the convenience store, as families
in the refugee class may well be expected to have less disposable income which
would permit their youth paying admission to see movies, however ubiquitous and
attractive these may be. In contrast, the families of Canadian citizens, having
been in the country at least three years and more, are more likely to have such
disposable income and favourable dispositions. Similarly, the representation of
computers by six students, five of whom are Asians, whereas over 90% of the
Canadian citizens do not have computers represented is indicative of the
symbolic status of the computer among Asians. The significance of the link between the practice of religious beliefs
and an Asian or South Asian mother tongue, is two-fold. On the one hand, it is
representative of the visibility of recent immigrants to Canada and of a strong
religious tradition as part of cultural elements of origin. Secondly, it is indicative
of the strength of bond between languages of prayer and a central cultural
value placed on religion, as speakers of these languages would tend to be
Buddhist, Sikh, or Muslims, all religions characterized by strong adherents or
faith believers. Significance of Schools. The most predictive factors for determining whether a school will be
represented in a participant's drawing is, in order of significance, that
person's religion, ethnicity, and the school attended. Over 83% of the
Christian students represent schools in their drawings, compared to only 36% of
all the Catholic students. Sixty percent of the Muslim students represent
schools in their drawings. All of the Buddhist, Hindu, and Punjabi participants
draw schools in their pictures, but their numbers are too small for plausible
generalizations. Only one-third of the
participants from the Americas (North, South, Central) and Europe represented a
school in their drawings while over 60% of the Asians put schools in their
drawings (68% for the East Asians, 60% for the South Asians). All of the
students in School L in the public school district represented schools in their
drawings and the majority of students in two of the Catholic junior high
schools (M, N) included their schools. By comparison, none of the students at
School P in the Catholic school district represented their schools, nor did
four out of five students at a high school (R) in the southeast quadrant of the
city, a highly concentrated immigrant receiving area. Participants at other
schools did not have sufficient numbers for plausible generalization. Whether or not the school is a public space or a semi-public one,[21]
reveals its liminal and yet bridging status, linking home and society, and
serving as training ground for student-citizens. In three of the
schools, most of the participants, if not all, represented their school in the
maps of their spaces, although the instructions provided to all the
groups clearly indicated that they should include the places where they spend
their time. It is probably reasonable to conclude that these three schools are
particularly welcoming and comfortable places for a diversity of students. As far as we can tell, from our data, this
appears be the case because of the presence of particularly warm, strong, fair
and caring individuals, either a principal or a teacher. As for the apparent
link between religion and the representation of schools, it is tempting to
suggest that some religions more than others place a central value on
education; however, additional data on these cultures would be necessary to
draw such a conclusion. The use of common places such as
libraries as gathering places for many of the research participants or
of a particular classroom is distinguished by factors of ethnicity and gender,
as well as by participants' grade and school. Every single person who included
a library in his or her school is East Asian. Additionally, all library
drawings in Schools L and M were done by students in the ninth grade, this in a
Canadian province which administers system-wide final examinations of
considerable importance, as these exams determine whether or not the student
continues on to high school. Moreover, almost 40% of the East Asian females
drew libraries, compared to 13% of East Asian males. Thus, among these East
Asian students, libraries are valued as they are understood to be places where
one can enhance one's own educational attainments and future prospects,
especially in schools with strong, caring figures among the teaching staff and
administrators. Private Uses of Public Spaces. Just as the school libraries are used for personal gain and advantage,
the importance of the small cafés and restaurants for a number of students,
especially females (ADDITIONAL INFO PLEASE), reflects the private use of public
spaces, for it is around small tables that the females narrate themselves,
share their sorrows and tribulations, seek solace and comfort amongst each
other. The males tend to talk about sports while valuing the bonding that
occurs in the use of these public places.
(QUOTES??) Athletic spaces are also featured in the drawings, influenced by
gender, ethnicity and religion, in order of importance. Eighty percent of the
boys compared with 41 % of the girls represent athletic spaces. Of these,
Asians (41% of South Asians and 61 % of East Asians) are less likely to
represent athletic spaces than members of other ethnic groups, for 80% of the
non-Asians include such spaces in their drawings. Moreover, 71% of Catholics
and 75 % of Christians are more likely to put athletic spaces in their drawings
than students adhering to other religious groups. A refinement on these
distributions of cultural elements comes with those who represent themselves as
actively engaged in playing sports, where a student's ethnicity is the
most significant variable. Over 44% of the Middle Easterners show themselves
playing a sport, compared with 33 % of students from Europe, the United States,
or Central and South America. Eleven percent of the East Asians and 20% of the
South Asians represent themselves as playing sports. Neither of the two
Africans drew themselves as playing a sport. While the overlap between ethnicity, religion and sports is
notable, what is salient here is the reinforcement of previously existing bonds
and the establishment of social engagement and participation, created with team
sports played out in public places. This, in terms of the current discourses on
citizenship engagement,[22]
is of considerable importance, as it also creates inclusions and exclusions
among student-citizens, who does not bode well for future civil\civic,
political and social participation in adult life. Travel and Fluidity.
Student participants from nearly every religion and most fluent language
category represent travel and other places in their pictures, whereas legal
status and length of residence in Canada are not significant factors. Thus, one
cannot claim that travel is most salient to recent arrivals. The ubiquitous
nature of travel and other places, as part of the lived experiences of these
youth, does however support an analysis of the permeability of boundaries with
lived movement across real or imagined lines, and of the fluidity of the
construction and reconstruction of self, taking into the weaving cultural elements
from a range of sources and streams of consciousness. (PUT IN DRAWING OF KID WITH RIVERS, AMONG OTHERS, SOME WITH
TROPICAL SETTINGS). Bedrooms as Territorial Cells. Surprisingly, 43% of the Catholic students draw their own bedrooms,
compared to less than 17% of the Christian and 25% of the Muslim student
participants. Almost all of the Middle Eastern students (eight out of nine)
chose not to represent their own bedrooms. The relationship between religion
and the representation of one's own bedroom is elusive; however, based upon
some of the discursive data, it is plausible to suggest that this is linked to
an issue of control of territoriality, and perhaps sexuality. (QUOTES ABOUT WHO TO LET IN....). Moreover, the control of sexuality is a salient feature of two of the
religions noted above, the Catholic and the Muslim religions; however, the
difference between them in regards to the home may be relevant, for it is at
home that the Muslim females may relax and remove the hijab, a religious practice
which may be linked to the lesser importance of the bedroom as cell for the
Muslim participants. Among the Catholics however, the control of sexuality even
and perhaps especially in private spaces remains important, which may also
influence the representation of 'own bedrooms' among almost half of these
participants. Physical Environment.
Given Calgary's location, nestled in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies and
famous for its skyline which reported resembles New York's, at least enough to
attract the film industry, nature scenes feature frequently in the drawings.
Four students included cityscapes, three of whom are female, all either
fourteen or fifteen at the time of data collection. Of those who included
nature in their picture, often in an idealized form, those who have been in
Canada for the shortest period of time were most likely to do so. Seventy-three
% of those who hold either landed immigrant, refugee or visitor status draw
nature scenes in their pictures, compared with 43 % of those who are Canadian
citizens. Nature representations are also significantly determined by the
school attended. Seven out of eight students at School M drew nature scenes, in
comparison with two of eight at either School L or P. Half or almost half of
those at Schools R and Q included nature scenes in their drawings, as did 62%
of students at School N. Given the configuration of influencing factors, it is possible that the
physical environment is most salient for the recently arrived for two reasons,
both related to the geographical location of the city or country of origin and
that of the host city. Moving from a tropical location to one in an northern
clime, even a city whose winter snows are frequently melted by warm dry Chinook
winds emanating from the Japanese current coming over the Rockies, is likely to
be a drastic change, sensitizing young people to the influence, particularities
and variability of climate. Thus, spatiality is realized in a wide range of elements in the
drawings, giving credence to the distinction between private and public spaces
in which adolescent immigrants create themselves, valuing market places,
schools and particularly their libraries, playing fields, travel, one's own
bedroom, cityscapes and other natural phenomena. Conclusion The analysis and interpretation of the spatial and associative data of
these immigrant youth underlines the salience of two of three concepts, that of
connectivity and of spatiality. Making
friends as an immediate way of establishing self as open and willing to make
connections in the new context appears to be a winning strategy, one to be
facilitated in policies and practices designed to facilitate the integration of
recently arrived student immigrants as future citizens of Canada. The enactment of friendships in a private way in public spaces leads
one to question however, just how youngsters already in their mid-teens are to
learn to participate in public life, as participating in civic, political and
social activities are not reported in the data. It is suggested that school
content that focuses upon history without including attention to the
geographical basis of citizenship and the collective nature of participation
would be insufficient to assure the future life of citizens. Thus, spatiality in its most visible, active and territorial forms
serves to strengthen the saliency of connectivity and its immediacy in
supportive friendships and team sports, as these are enacted within public
spaces. Given the limitations on participation, what is to be facilitated here
is general participation as a means of establishing the basis of civic,
political and social participation in future years. Endnotes [1]. The
youth who participated in an earlier study set in a minority context considered
themselves to be 'un projet de vie'; see Yvonne M. Hébert, Choice of Friends
and of Identity among Minority Youth: A Case Study of Francophone Adolescents,
in Keith McLeod, ed., Multicultural Education: The State of the Art, Studies
of Canadian Heritage. (Nepean: Canadian Association of Second Language
Teachers, 1995). [2].As
identified in 1997 by the Policy Research Initiative and the Social Sciences
and Humanities Research Council of Canada, which launched a joint initiative to
have prepared key papers, by teams of researchers, to be published in a series
of volumes by the University of Toronto Press and les Presses Universitaires de
Montréal. The Environmental Pressures team is under the leadership of Edward A.
Parson (Harvard University), Globalization with Janice Stein and David Cameron
(University of Toronto), Multiple Centres of Power with Gordon Smith
(Universities of Victoria and British Columbia), North American Relations with
George Hoberg (University of British Columbia), Population Ageing with Verena
Haldemann (Université de Moncton), Social Differentiation with Danielle Juteau
(Université de Montréal), Technological Change with Donald McFetridge (Carleton
University) and Value Change with Neil Nevitte (University of Toronto). [3]. As
perceived by Zygmunt Bauman, The Making and Unmaking of Strangers, in Pnina
Werbner and Tariq Modood, eds., Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multicultural
Identities and the Politics of Racism, (London: ZED Books, 1997: 46-57). [4]. See
Harold Troper, The Historical Context of Citizenship Education in Urban Canada,
to appear in Y. M. Hébert, ed., Citizenship in Transformation: Conceptual
and Pedagogical Issues, (University of Toronto Press, 2000). [5]. First
announced in 1971, the Multiculturalism Policy was promulgated as law in An
Act for the Preservation and Enhancement of Multiculturalism in Canada
(1988); the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) also protects
cultural and linguistic diversity. [6].
Bauman, The Making and Unmaking of Strangers (1997: 50). [7].
Multiculturalism is understood differently in various states; see in this
regard, Yumas Samad, The Plural Guises of Multiculturalism: Conceptualising a
Fragmented Paradigm, in Tariq Modood and Pnina Werbner, The Politics of
Multiculturalism in the New Europe: Racism, Identity and Community.
(London: ZED Books, 1997: 240-267). [8].See
for example, Leo Driedger, Multi-Ethnic Canada: Identities and Inequalities.
(Toronto: Oxford University Press); Christiane Gohier et Michel Schleifer, La
question de l'identité : Qui suis-je? Qui est l'autre? (Montréal : Les
Éditions Logiques, Inc., 1993); and Frances E. Aboud and Anna-Beth Doyle,
L'identité ethnique: Son fondement philosophique et son impact en éducation. In
C. Gohier et M. Schleifer, eds., La question de l'identité: Qui suis-je? Qui
est l'autre? (Montréal : Les Éditions Logiques, Inc., 1993: 41-60). [9]. See
France Gagnon et Michel Pagé, Conceptual Framework for an Analysis of Citizenship
in the Liberal Democracies. Volume I: Conceptual Framework and Analysis.
(Ottawa: Department of Canadian Heritage, 1999). [10].
Hans-Rudolf Wicker, From Complex Culture to Cultural Complexity, in Pnina
Werbner and Tariq Modood, eds., Debating Cultural Hybridity: Multi-Cultural
Identities and the Politics of Anti-Racism (London: ZED Books, 1997:
29-45). [11].
Barbara Rogoff, Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social
Context. (New York: Oxford University Press). [12].
Wicker, From Complex Culture to Cultural Complexity, 38. [13].
Wicker, ibid., 39; Ulf Hannerz, Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social
Organization of Meaning. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992);
Fredrick Barth, Balinese Worlds. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
1993: 339). [14].
Bauman, The Making and Unmaking of Strangers, 57. [15].
Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
and Canadian Heritage (1998-2001), under the title, Strategic Competence:
Identity Formation of Immigrant Youth, with Dr. Yvonne Hébert as principal
investigator. [16].
According to J. Frideres, based on an examination of the Census of Canada
(1996). [17]. The
two research assistants at the time were Christine Racicot and Rani Murji, the
former still associated with the project and intending to complete a masters'
thesis based upon this data. [18]. The
instructions given to the research participants were the following: "Draw us a
map of the spaces where you spend your time, or where you have spent time and
that have had something to do with who you are. Include yourself and the people
you spend time with in the maps. Draw
the activities which occur. (What you do in these spaces.) Draw your public and
private spaces." Source: Christine Racicot's Notes, Winter 1999. [19]. See
the work of the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur on the nature of friendship,
especially in Individu et identité personnelle, in Sur l'individu,
Contributions au colloque de Royaumont. (Paris : Éditions du Seuil, 1987);
and in Soi-même comme un autre. (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1990). [20]. For
the legislation that protects diversity in Canada, see the Multiculturalism
Policy (1971), supplanted by: An Act for the Preservation and Enhancement of
Multiculturalism in Canada (1988); as well as the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms (1982); for academic discussions of multiple
citizenship, see Yvonne Hébert and Lori Wilkinson, The Citizenship Debates:
Conceptual, Identity and Pedagogical Issues, in Y. Hébert, ed., Citizenship
in Transformation. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, to appear);
Michel Pagé, Pluralistic Citizenship: A Reference for Citizenship Education, Canadian
Ethnic Studies(29, 2, 1987), 22-31; for a revised view of
liberalism, see Will Kymlicka, Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of
Minority Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995); and for a communitarian
view of citizenship, see Charles Taylor, Reconciling the Solitudes: Essays
on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. (Montréal & Kingston:
McGill-Queen's University Press, 1993) and The Politics of Recognition in Amy
Gutman, ed., Multiculturalism. (Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1994: 25-72). [21]. The
categorization of spaces with respect to social structures and functions yields
different ways of looking. For example, Myer Siemiatycki and Engin Isin
distinguish private from public spaces, in their paper, Immigration, Diversity
and Urban Citizenship in Toronto, Canadian Journal of Regional Science
(XX (1997) 1, 2: 73-102). Focussing
more on functions of socialization, Pietro Emili classifies spaces and
structures as follows: the primary socializing group are those formed by
parents, extended families, and the circle of most intimate friends; examples
of the secondary socializing group include school classes, groups of university
friends and political associates, the larger network of friends, groups of
colleagues that form in work places or around activities; and finally, the
third socializing group consists of the public administration, the State, the
tribunals, etc.; see P. Emili, Le principe de subsidiarité, Norme secondaire de
citoyenneté, dans F. Audigier, coordinateur invité, Éducation et
citoyenneté, numéro thématique, Éducation, Revue de diffusion des
savoirs en éducation, (16 (1999): 10-13). [22].A fine
example of multiple public discourses on citizenship engagement is its presence
as a horizontal theme at the National Policy Research Conference: Analysing
the Trends, held in Ottawa on November 25-26, 1999, where it was addressed
in many sessions and discussions, some of which are the following: Ron Deibert
(U Toronto) on The State: New Wine in Old Bottles; Rod Dobell (U Victoria) on
Thinking "Glocally": Citizens and the Environment; Julien Bauer (UQAM), on
Ménage à trois: The State, the International System, and the Civil Society;
Vincent Della Sala (Carleton University) on Governance of Politics Without a
Centre; Franklyn Griffiths (U Toronto) and Robin Higham (U Ottawa) on Economics
and Culture: Finding Balance; Andrew H. Clement (U Toronto), Leslie Regan Shade
(U Ottawa) and Gail Valaskakis (Aboriginal Healing Foundation) on Citizens at
the Crossroads: Whose Information Society?; Lloyd Wong (U Calgary) on Thick
versus Loose Citizenship; David Docherty (Wilfrid Laurier University) on
Citizens and Legislators: Views on Representation; John W. Foster (U
Saskatchewan) on Civil Society in International Fora; |