Metropolis is an international network for comparative research and public policy development on migration, diversity, and immigrant integration in cities in Canada and around the world Search image1 Search image3
Search image2

The International Metropolis Project is a forum for bridging research, policy and practice on migration and diversity.
The Project aims to enhance academic research capacity, encourage policy-relevant research on migration and diversity issues,
and facilitate the use of that research by governments and non-governmental organizations.

 
nav line Home nav line About Us nav line Research and Policy nav line Events nav line Partners nav line Publications nav line Contact Us
  
 

IMMIGRATION PHENOMENON AND RIGHT TO HEALTH IN ITALY

Luigi Toma

 

Introduction

For several years, the World Health Organisation (WHO), has used the term Human Mobile Population to define immigrants, refugees, political asylum applicants, exiles, workers in transit, travellers, tourists; therefore all persons that for various reasons move from one country to another. According to WHO data, over 1 billion of people left their national boarders at least once in 2001 alone. In particular, 135 million migrated in search of work. A reservoir of desperation on the rise which in the eighties numbered 70 million.

Since a few years, Italy has been affected by the reality of immigration and currently represents the fourth European Union country, after Germany, France and Great Britain, in proportion to the number of immigrants it hosts, with an incidence of 2.9% on the resident population, compared to the European Union average of 5.1 %.

For over a century, our peninsula has experienced the phenomenon of emigration, along with all the cultural, political and health consequences that this entails. However, from the mid-seventies, the migratory flux of Italy began to invert due to the substantial increase of immigrations which, in the years that followed, took on permanent and structural traits.

How many immigrants are there in Italy?

Foreigners regularly landed in Italy are now estimated to be around 1.6 million (with an incidence of 2.9% on the resident population against the average EU incidence of 5.1%). The immigrant population has increased by 240.000 units from 1.252.000 of last year to 1.490.000; broken-down represents approx. 10.000 born in Italy of foreign parents, between 80-90.000 new arrivals with entry visas and 146.000 of those persons already legalised.

The archives of the Ministry of Interiors supplies only partial data since it does not record all the foreigners regularly present in Italy, but only those who possess legal permission of stay. Therefore minors usually escape the data system as they are inserted in the "authorisation of stay" issued to the household heads. Minors only become holders when they enter for motives of adoption, fostering, whenever unaccompanied by their parents, or if already resident they formally apply for permission of stay, after their 14th birthday, in order obtain an official "employment-card".

The foreigners recorded by the Ministry of Interiors on December 31st 2000, including those of the European Union, totalled 1.252.000 compared to 1.033.000 of the preceding year.

However, in order to reach a general estimate of all the foreigners staying in Italy on a regular basis, it is necessary to increase this number by at least 19% so as to include the minors, unrecorded for the aforesaid motives, as well as those people whose permission of stay (newly granted or renewed) has not yet been processed due to bureaucratic delays. This method is proposed by the work-team of the Italian Caritas that elaborates the Dossier on Immigration Statistics.

 

Migrations and health

Migrations are a predictable source of stress and health hazards because they involve a new organisation of life-styles consequent to an eradication from their original environment and personal security. For this reason, the health protection of emigrants becomes one of strategic importance, also in view of safeguarding the health of all persons at risk of emargination.

The problem of "emigration medicine" consists in the duty to assist persons whose socio-sanitary conditions are in the process of social and cultural transformation. As far as concerns the relationship between illnesses, symptoms, culture and ethnic affinity, evident correlations between specific pathologies and determined peoples, or ethnic groups, have never been observed. These patients present a very different attitude towards the experience of illness, pain, suffering and death. The diverse perceptions of the symptoms in relation to the various cultures of origin is valid for all populations. It is necessary to take into account that immigrants often use "somatic metaphors" as the briefest and easiest means of expressing otherwise non communicable emotions and feelings. Very often, they accuse symptoms of cenestopathic type (head-aches, digestive troubles, vague and diffused pains, itching, burning at urination, worries about their personal and physical well- being), without there being somatic comparisons. The process of change which immigrants have to face requires a continuous upheaval of their personal, historical and cultural identity. It could be said that immigrants know in advance that they will be required to adapt to completely different situations and that this will involve a heavy price; the advance expectation of suffering is not enough to eliminate it. It is necessary that we physicians, who often run the risk diagnosing only by somatic metaphor, when examining patients from foreign cultures, become capable of understanding the entire aspect and deeper sense of their attempts to recovering a new identity (Frighi,1990).

An Italian Experience: The Institute of San Gallicano (IRCCS)

Within the panorama of institutions committed to the field of immigrant health, the experience of the Scientific Institute of San Gallicano in Rome can supply useful elements for a broader comprehension of the problem. In fact, the Preventive Medicine Unit for Migrations, Tourism and Tropical Dermatology, active within the institute since the beginning of January 1985, has for many years represented the only point of public reference for the care, assistance, clinical-epidemiological and socio-anthropological research concerning the immigrant, nomadic and homeless population.

The service, which is free of charge and open every day, constitutes a valid observatory on the health conditions of these particular sectors of the population and the risk of diseases they are subject to.

From January 1st 1985 to December 31th 2000, irregular and clandestine immigrant patients admitted to the Preventive Medicine Unit for Migrations for a first medical examination numbered 42,820 of which: 16,227 (37.9%) were female and 26,593 (62.1%) were male. 10% were constituted by children, who were much rarer in past and have become are more frequent. (see Table A).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Table A -Immigrant Patients observed from January 1st 1985 to December 31th 2000.

San Gallicano Institute of Rome -(IRCCS) Preventive Medicine Unit for Migrations, Tourism & Tropical Medicine.

 

 

Currently 36% originate from Africa (compared to 73% in 1985-91 and 48% in 1992-94),18% from Central & South America (compared to 7% in 1985-91 and 22% in 1992-94),22% from Asia (compared to 12%in 1985- 91 and 21% in 1992-94), and 24% arriving from Eastern Europe (compared to 8% in 1985-91 and19% in 1992-94). (see Table B)

 

Table B -Immigrant Patients according to Continent of Origin


 


10.0% belongs to 0-12 year old age group, while 69.0% belongs the 13- year old age group; as a whole, 79% of the immigrants observed are under 40 years of age (see Table C). It is interesting to note the gradual increase of elderly immigrants, over sixty years old, that exceed 11% in our figures.

  


Table C -Immigrant Patients according to age

 


As far as concerns the level of education, 11% possesses an elementary education, 23.2% have attended lower secondary school, 38% present a higher level of secondary education, 9.8% a university level of education, while 18% have a university degree; besides their mother tongue, 86% also speak fluent English, French, Spanish or Italian.

The emigrated person in general, does not use preventive strategies but addresses the social-health services only in case of emergency or full-blown ness; when not longer able to go without medical aid. In the past, we had defined this phenomenon as the healthy migrant effect, due to the self-selection of those who decide to emigrate, which today instead is only partly true (Morrone, 1995). The health patrimony of immigrants, albeit they arrive safe and sound in Italy, rapidly diminishes (well-being interval) due to a series of risk factors: psychological discomfort related to the condition of being an immigrant; lack of work and income; underemployment in risky unprotected jobs; degraded housing in a different context from the country of origin; absence of family support; different climate  and eating habits (which further compromise conditions of debilitated nutritional status); discrimination in the access to health services. In the last 4 years this interval period, spent from arrival in Italy to the first request for medical treatment (in which conditions defined as illnesses of unease or illnesses from degradation may manifest), has been drastically reduced from 10-12 months in 1993-94 to 2-3 months in the 1995-1998 period.

Moreover, some immigrants tend to take on illnesses that indicate a state of extreme emargination, the diseases of poverty: tuberculosis, scabies, pediculosis, mycosis, certain viral and venereal infections which characterise the homeless population. According to the base-line data, collected on a very broad range, a few years ago the average immigrant generally appeared as a strong, young, psychologically more stable person with a greater spirit of initiative. Therefore, healthier and aware that the strength of the body together with one's working ability was the only initial means of exchange that one had with the new society. A good state of health represented the only certainty upon which to invest one's future. Today, due to a series of complex factors, there are also people entering our territory who are no longer young, less acculturated, with transitory and unspecific migratory projects. These included criminals who take advantage of the desperate conditions of other immigrants, while some manage the drugs traffic and prostitution, above all from Eastern Europe; whereby the health profile of these persons has also been modified.

In fact, it is not just a work-force that arrives but persons, human beings, with their emotions, fee1ings and health conditions ( often no longer that of "superman").

The main pathology observed in these patients is not far removed from that of the Italians, except for some particular aspects which can be divided into: 52% dermatological diseases, 10.7% respiratory illnesses, 9.2% diseases of the digestive system, 8.6% orthopaedic and traumatic illnesses, 11% infectious illnesses. The latter increased in the last two years from 7% to 11 % showing an increase in viral hepatitis A, B & C, formerly rather rare together with various cases of leprosy. Neuro-psychiatric troubles are also in slight increase reaching 5% in 1997.

Although not particularly high, AIDS has increased in number and assumes precociously terminal forms, along with the terrible difficulty of living this dramatic experience in a foreign environment.

Substantially, immigrants do not introduce particularly serious pathologies of tropical or very different nature in comparison to the resident population, if not for the frequent lack of basic health protection and therefore, the possibility of diagnosis and therapies in brief and effective time consenting a more effective course of improvement and complete recovery.

Main Factors concerning the health of immigrants

Concerning the most frequent illnesses, it is necessary to introduce the premise that up until 2-3 years ago immigrants arriving in Italy somehow represented a select part of the population (i.e. the youngest, healthiest and strongest, able to undertake long and dangerous journeys and succeed in disembarking or crossing over boarders).

However, various health risks can be under-lined:

1. The origin from high risk zones of certain illnesses (parasitic, tuberculosis, malaria, leprosy, Aids) could have exposed them to these infections and it is necessary that it be possible to examine them immediately in order to consent correct diagnosis and timely therapies.

2. The journeys which have now become more and more inhuman often foster the development of disease caused by lack of basic hygienic conditions. Being crowded in 300 -400 persons for 30 -40 days in a boat that could accommodate a maximum of 60-80 passengers, implies favouring the impressive development of intestinal, pulmonary, liver and skin infections. Physiological processes (urination, menstruation, pregnancy, etc.) often become health risks.

3. When they succeed in arriving in Italy uninjured, during their stay in our cities, often in miserable conditions of shelter coupled with the . noted difficulty in accessing the National Health Service, the possibility of remaining healthy, particularly for women and children, becomes a significant problem.

4. A real pathology due to psycho-physical impoverishment superimposes as time passes, thus increasing a predisposition to inflammations of the upper and lower respiratory tracts, digestive system, skin, genital-urinary tract as well as infections present in Italy.

5. Persistent states of degradation can easily manifest the clinical symptoms of latent infections such as hepatitis, particularly A, B & C, tuberculosis and sexually transmitted disease.

6. Many psychosomatic and anxiety-depressive syndromes have also recently been observed particularly in immigrants arriving from war zones (Kosovo, Sierra Leone and Kurdistan).

7. The cases of refugees that have been subjected to torture in their countries of origin are also on the increase.

8. Many women still address our Service in an advanced state of pregnancy, in the second or even the third trimester, without ever having undergone a specialised examination.

9. The health condition of woman and children needs particular attention because the symptoms of some diseases can often be deceptive, therefore the communication skills of a Cultural Mediator is required.

10. Natural events like giving birth or the most banal inflammatory pathologies often become preoccupying situations for these persons, at times seriously life-threatening, due to the difficulty in accessing a health net-work capable of receiving and understanding them.

Currently, at least six critical areas are important to underline concerning the health of immigrants:

1. The increase of infectious disease bearing upon various organs: skin, pu1monary, sexual, liver and neurological; very scarce in past but now more frequent. Correct clinical diagnosis of these conditions is often delayed due to deceptive clinical symptoms.

2. The appearance of anxiety-depressive syndromes and psychic disorders. The risk of not being able to adequately diagnose these conditions and the difficulty of planning psychological support in a foreign language;

3. The inadequacy of maternal-childcare interventions, expressed by the increased rates of premature births, caesarean-cuts and pre-natal mortality in this strata of the population in comparison to the Italian average;

4. The risk of illnesses connected to prostitution such as HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases. The cases of AIDS among the foreign population reported to the COA have increased from 1-2% in 1992 to 10% in 1999;

5. Drug addiction, evidenced above all in the jails where immigrants, particularly those without permission of stay, total one third of the entire prison population in Italy;

6. The shortage of services devoted to the health of woman: prevention of female tumours, contraception, voluntary termination of pregnancy.

Health Legislation concerning Immigrants

The protection of the health of immigrants stationed in Italy represents a very complex theme, in as much as the legal formalities foreseen, allowing foreigners access to the National Health Service, are very different.

The subject of health assistance to foreigners has always been marginally faced in health laws (see Law 833/78, LD 663/79, DPR December 24th 1992) and it is only since Law 943/86 that " parity of treatment and fu1l equality of rights in comparison to Italian workers " (Article. 1) has been recognised to " non-European Union workers and their families legally resident ...".

The implementation of such declaration (also on the basis of the updating introduced by the successive Law 39/90), nevertheless left a series of situations uncovered (the non-resident, unemployed) and the persistence of obvious discriminatory treatment.

With the Unified Code of Procedures concerning the discip1ine of immigration and norms on the condition of the foreigner (Legislative Decree n. 286 of July 25th 1998) that incorporates Law 40/98, notable progress was made towards the health protection rights of foreigners present on national territory. In particular, tide V; heading I -Dispositions in health matters, moreover affirms:

-Article 34. Regularly landed foreigners are obliged to register on the national health service and have parity of treatment and have full equality of rights and duties in comparison to Italian citizens.

-Article 35. Foreign citizens present on national territory, who are not in compliance with the relative norms of entry and stay, shall be assured urgent medical and hospital treatment (or nevertheless essential) in public and accredited structures, including continuous treatment for illness and accidents as well as preventive medicine and collective health programs. Moreover, in paragraph 5, the law establishes that access to health structures by the "irregular" foreigner cannot involve any type of signa1ling to the authorities except for cases, at parity of conditions with the Italian citizen, in which a report would be compulsory.

To grant health performances, by guaranteeing the prohibition of judicial signalling, allows foreigners to emerge from "a clandestine state of health" and approaches those who, for fear of being reported or expelled from State territory, would never have been able to cure themselves.

With the exception of EU foreigners and those covered by international social safety conventions, two categories of immigrants are distinguished: those "registered on the NHS" and those "not registered on the NHS".

Foreigners registered on the National Health Service

This category comprises two types:

-subjects that are recognised the obligation of NHS registration;

-subjects that are covered by an insurance policy against the risk of illness, maternity and accident.

 

1) The first category comprises regularly landed foreigners that carry out subordinate or autonomous work activities or are registered on the unemployment lists. The obligation of registration is also valid for foreigners present for political asylum, humanitarian, family, adoption and motives of acquiring citizenship. For all these subjects, equal rights and duties at parity with the Italian citizen is recognised. Moreover, there are two other novelties worth noting that should make access to the NHS mare serviceable:

-a residence permit is no longer required but "permission of stay" is sufficient far registering on the NHS;

-for these subjects, registration on the NHS comes into effect the moment permission of stay is granted; it remains valid for the length of the permission of stay and during the time required far its renewal. In other words, the registration expires only in the case in which the permission of stay is withdrawn or no longer renewed. The annual validity of the NHS registration, which foresaw the automatic cancellation of all immigrants from the regional lists at the end of every year obliging them to reapply to the Local Health Units far new registration, has been eliminated. NHS registration is also valid far family dependants.

2) The second category comprises all subjects that regularly sojourn in Italy, with the exception of tourists, far reasons other than those described (i.e. study, au pair jobs, religious motives) far which insurance coverage is compulsory. For these, a specific insurance policy against the risk of illness, maternity and accident, stipulated with private insurance companies (Italian or otherwise) or directly with the NHS, is foreseen.

Foreigners not registered on the National Health Service

This category comprises all foreigners temporarily stationed on national territory, including those with legal entry and staying permits as well as those that are irregular or clandestine. Before analysing the current eligibility it is useful to specify some subject types included in this category, namely non-legal subjects; those who entered the country illegally and those who have not renewed their position at the expiry of their visa or staying permit. The category is therefore much broader than thought to be and many of these find themselves in such condition due to gaps or arbitrariness of the normative. An example is the "de facto rejoining of families".

As a formally recognised right, the rejoining of families lacks a punctual normative that guarantees it. The muddled bureaucratic procedures required and the high degree of discretion left to the competent organs (in verifying the adequacy of shelter and income) create the condition that the family members (prevalently women, children and the elderly) "irregularly" join the nucleus while waiting to comply with the procedures.

One of the paradoxes in this sector is that "irregularly" present children of school-going age are recognised the right to an education (and inserted in the compulsory school system) but not that of health.

While waiting for a reply to the request for refugee status or the result of a recourse after a first refusal, political asylum applicants find themselves in a condition of "invisibility". They can remain in Italian territory but in reality cannot work, nor obtain residence, or access the health services. In this period, health assistance is available only in special reception centres and the necessary treatment is supplied "in relation to the health context of refugees" by the ASL or by "other health structures of associations and religious bodies, the expense of which is covered by the Department of Civil Protection".

The content of the article constitutes a very positive signal within the logic that health protection is a fundamental right of the individual, regard- less of their legal status, as stated in the "International Human Rights Declaration " and the Italian Constitution.

What now needs to be understood is how its application will be translated; numerous points are still difficult to interpret. In particular, the clarification of what is considered "urgent and essential treatment" and which criteria shall be adopted for evaluating subjects "without sufficient economic resources".

On the other hand, the issue of how the continuity of treatment shall be guaranteed and by whom: if in fact is predictable that medical emergencies and accidents shall be administered by the hospitals, will the continuity of treatment or essential, but not urgent, problems be managed within "ad hoc" spaces or assigned to basic medicine as for Italian citizens?

On the other hand, if the law expressly defines a clear-cut demarcation line between medical-health operators and police control regarding "illegal status" how can signalling to the Prefecture be avoided if it is the Prefecture that must refund the hospitals and therefore require the particulars of the patient in order to do so?

The reality of our health structure is a multiform galaxy that can give very different answers to the treatment requests of citizens. Guaranteeing this right, still too often depends on the ability and will of the single individual, other than the condition of local health structures, while the interpretation of the legal system remains uncertain.

A long journey yet remains to be accomplished, that which transforms recognised rights into acquired ones: the fact that only slightly over 50% of immigrants who enjoy this right are registered on the NHS cannot simply be attributed to disorientation or bureaucratic difficulties. A global problem of structural, social and cultural accessibility exists which needs to be faced in order to render the existing system more serviceable and improve the relation between health demands and services offered.

Many good laws have remained inapplicable, or poorly applied, due to lack of financial coverage: the rights recognised by law have been effectively unconsidered. Health in general and many specialised fields such as mental health, prevention, geriatrics are the concrete example of this persistent discrepancy between word and fact.

The President of the Republic Decree n. 394, August 31st 1999, (Ordinary Supplement to the Official Gazette number 258 of the 3rd XI 1999): Regulation concerning the norms of realisation of the Unifìed Code concerning the discipline of immigration and norms on the condition of the foreigner, in compliance with Article I, Paragraph 6, of Legislative Decree n. 286, July 25'h 1998; completes the reform and updating of normative that allow foreign citizens, whether regularly or "irregularly" stationed on national territory, ordinary access to the preventive care, treatment and rehabilitation of the National Health Service.